How many mathematicians are on earth living right now?
Q. Count the amount of mathematicians on the face of the earth. Estimate the amount which are living right now.
Asked by Xavier X - Thu Dec 11 16:55:22 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Not so sure how many alive, must be alot because my husband is one of them and most of his friends are mathematicians.
Answered by Ly Nguyen - Thu Dec 11 17:01:03 2008
Q. Count the amount of mathematicians on the face of the earth. Estimate the amount which are living right now.
Asked by Xavier X - Thu Dec 11 16:55:22 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Not so sure how many alive, must be alot because my husband is one of them and most of his friends are mathematicians.
Answered by Ly Nguyen - Thu Dec 11 17:01:03 2008
Who were the greatest mathematicians of all time?
Q. I'm looking for your opinion of, at most, the top three mathematicians of all time. Tell me what you think.
Asked by Pete - Tue Apr 24 06:27:09 2007 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. There's only one unarguable, nobody-informed-could-dis agree member of the list: Gauss. He probably did the most important work of all time in each of the fields of abstract algebra/number theory, differential geometry, and statistics. And he did quite a bit of other stuff as well. The next guy on my personal list is Euclid. His geometry wasn't superseded for almost 2000 years. He did a bit of number theory too. Other than Aristotle, Plato, and Socrates, he was probably THE most influential thinker in a several-century period, and certainly the only candidate who was a mathematician. The third spot is a many-way competition. The contenders include Archimedes, Euler, Riemann, and Poincare'.
Answered by Curt Monash - Tue Apr 24 07:33:24 2007
Q. I'm looking for your opinion of, at most, the top three mathematicians of all time. Tell me what you think.
Asked by Pete - Tue Apr 24 06:27:09 2007 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. There's only one unarguable, nobody-informed-could-dis agree member of the list: Gauss. He probably did the most important work of all time in each of the fields of abstract algebra/number theory, differential geometry, and statistics. And he did quite a bit of other stuff as well. The next guy on my personal list is Euclid. His geometry wasn't superseded for almost 2000 years. He did a bit of number theory too. Other than Aristotle, Plato, and Socrates, he was probably THE most influential thinker in a several-century period, and certainly the only candidate who was a mathematician. The third spot is a many-way competition. The contenders include Archimedes, Euler, Riemann, and Poincare'.
Answered by Curt Monash - Tue Apr 24 07:33:24 2007
What do Greek mathematicians use for their variables?
Q. More generally, what do mathematicians the world over use for variables? Do they use letters from their home tongue or is their a universal standard?
Asked by ne1av1cr - Wed Sep 24 22:41:26 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Well, the most common letter for the variables is x (which is the same with the greek letter chi). So there is no difference. After that they usually use the letters psi( ) and omega ( ). Generally, all the letters of the greek and latin alphabets can be used except for pi ( ).
Answered by M K - Thu Sep 25 17:08:39 2008
Q. More generally, what do mathematicians the world over use for variables? Do they use letters from their home tongue or is their a universal standard?
Asked by ne1av1cr - Wed Sep 24 22:41:26 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Well, the most common letter for the variables is x (which is the same with the greek letter chi). So there is no difference. After that they usually use the letters psi( ) and omega ( ). Generally, all the letters of the greek and latin alphabets can be used except for pi ( ).
Answered by M K - Thu Sep 25 17:08:39 2008
Are there different kinds of mathematicians or is just one whole math?
Q. Im ok at math, I hate geometery but super good at algebra. I want to put my algbra at a good use in the world. I get B's in my classes, currently failing astronomy and finance. But Acing all classes. So do mathematicians come in eaCh catagory like geometry, algebra, calculus?
Asked by Tiger - Wed Apr 25 17:07:52 2007 - - 7 Answers - 0 Comments
A. There are most definitely different areas of mathematics that mathematicians specialize in, but if you want to be a mathematician, you'll eventually have to discover that geometry is beautiful. I suspect you dislike geometry because of the way it was taught to you. Keep an open mind for when you have to take another geometry class, the next time you might discover how much you like it. Oh, and if you like algebra, then you should look forward to Analytic Geometry, which is the marriage between Algebra and Geometry.
Answered by Jim L - Wed Apr 25 17:16:07 2007
Q. Im ok at math, I hate geometery but super good at algebra. I want to put my algbra at a good use in the world. I get B's in my classes, currently failing astronomy and finance. But Acing all classes. So do mathematicians come in eaCh catagory like geometry, algebra, calculus?
Asked by Tiger - Wed Apr 25 17:07:52 2007 - - 7 Answers - 0 Comments
A. There are most definitely different areas of mathematics that mathematicians specialize in, but if you want to be a mathematician, you'll eventually have to discover that geometry is beautiful. I suspect you dislike geometry because of the way it was taught to you. Keep an open mind for when you have to take another geometry class, the next time you might discover how much you like it. Oh, and if you like algebra, then you should look forward to Analytic Geometry, which is the marriage between Algebra and Geometry.
Answered by Jim L - Wed Apr 25 17:16:07 2007
is it true mathematicians have very high IQs?How do i get a high IQ to?
Q. i heard mathematicians have very high IQs as compared to those who are not good in maths,is dis true?How do i get a high IQ to be able to memorize things fast in class?
Asked by nikotinic - Mon Oct 1 10:03:04 2007 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. It is generally thought the IQ is a somewhat fixed commodity. Those with high IQs may have a tendencey to find math easier, but that may not be the only nor deciding factor.
Answered by Earl D - Mon Oct 1 10:23:10 2007
Q. i heard mathematicians have very high IQs as compared to those who are not good in maths,is dis true?How do i get a high IQ to be able to memorize things fast in class?
Asked by nikotinic - Mon Oct 1 10:03:04 2007 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. It is generally thought the IQ is a somewhat fixed commodity. Those with high IQs may have a tendencey to find math easier, but that may not be the only nor deciding factor.
Answered by Earl D - Mon Oct 1 10:23:10 2007
Can someone help me with info on women mathematicians?
Q. I need a lot of women mathematicians, and atleast six facts about each, very important!
Asked by alliehalfempty - Wed May 14 22:22:58 2008 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I would go to this site and look through all of these. Women in math ROCK! I am one, and hope to do great things with math like these women.
Answered by MathNerd - Wed May 14 22:27:55 2008
Q. I need a lot of women mathematicians, and atleast six facts about each, very important!
Asked by alliehalfempty - Wed May 14 22:22:58 2008 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I would go to this site and look through all of these. Women in math ROCK! I am one, and hope to do great things with math like these women.
Answered by MathNerd - Wed May 14 22:27:55 2008
Mathematicians, how do you properly calculate the percentage of return on my investment?
Q. If i spent $182 on an investment and it makes $56 for a total of $238, how do I calculate the percentage of return on my investment. I do it a couple of different ways and come up with different answers, so I would like to know the correct way. Thanks ; )
Asked by Fled Nanders - Thu Jan 3 19:10:43 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. It's a simple formula actually. % return = (final price - initial price) / initial price * 100% In your case, (238-182)/182 *100% = 30.8% Keep printing that money!
Answered by mets - Thu Jan 3 19:56:39 2008
Q. If i spent $182 on an investment and it makes $56 for a total of $238, how do I calculate the percentage of return on my investment. I do it a couple of different ways and come up with different answers, so I would like to know the correct way. Thanks ; )
Asked by Fled Nanders - Thu Jan 3 19:10:43 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. It's a simple formula actually. % return = (final price - initial price) / initial price * 100% In your case, (238-182)/182 *100% = 30.8% Keep printing that money!
Answered by mets - Thu Jan 3 19:56:39 2008
Do physicists have to know as much math and in so much detail as mathematicians do?
Q. Im in high school and I love science (...math second) and I love to study and read about atoms and radiation and subatomic particles. So as a career I want to become a nuclear physicist b/c they study the atomic nucleus and all of the interesting features of it. But I may find math a bit fun but when I see the work mathematicians do it kind of scares me b/c I dont understand one bit of it and I just dont have the love for math to go that far into it. And I know Einstein and many other great physicists could do that kind of math. So do physicists have to know math that fluently?
Asked by Businessman - Sun Aug 19 14:19:02 2007 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Generally, no. The sort of mathematics that physicists and engineers use is but a small fraction of what formal mathematics is. Engineers and physicists use applied mathematics (partial differential differential equations, statistics, and computer science) as a sort of language to comprehend and model various phenomena encountered in the natural world. They are somewhat less concerned with formalized proofs, thoerems and lemmas. In fact, Einstein remarked that once the mathematicians formalized his tensor calculus, even he didn't even understand relativity anymore!
Answered by engineer - Sun Aug 19 14:44:02 2007
Q. Im in high school and I love science (...math second) and I love to study and read about atoms and radiation and subatomic particles. So as a career I want to become a nuclear physicist b/c they study the atomic nucleus and all of the interesting features of it. But I may find math a bit fun but when I see the work mathematicians do it kind of scares me b/c I dont understand one bit of it and I just dont have the love for math to go that far into it. And I know Einstein and many other great physicists could do that kind of math. So do physicists have to know math that fluently?
Asked by Businessman - Sun Aug 19 14:19:02 2007 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Generally, no. The sort of mathematics that physicists and engineers use is but a small fraction of what formal mathematics is. Engineers and physicists use applied mathematics (partial differential differential equations, statistics, and computer science) as a sort of language to comprehend and model various phenomena encountered in the natural world. They are somewhat less concerned with formalized proofs, thoerems and lemmas. In fact, Einstein remarked that once the mathematicians formalized his tensor calculus, even he didn't even understand relativity anymore!
Answered by engineer - Sun Aug 19 14:44:02 2007
How did mathematicians derive the equation of a circle, x^2 + y^2 = r^2?
Q. I need help proving the equation of a circle, which is x^2 + y^2 = r^2. I know that there would have a prove, but I cant seem to find it anywhere. Please help. I need help proving the equation of a circle, with general equations, not relating to actual graphs or anything. I need a general equation that can prove the equation by working from RHS to left hand side, or vic-versa without using actual values as examples, as prove.
Asked by BlitZeD - Wed Jul 23 05:23:12 2008 - - 3 Answers - 1 Comments
A. Go through the following link you will get much knowledge about it for solution of circle equation just draw a circle on a 2D graph keep its center on (0,0) then pick a point on circle draw radius and a perpendiclaer line to x axis now the tintersaction of that line on x axis will be p say o will be center and c will be choosen point on circle than line op will be base of a right angle tringle and oc will be diagonal and cp will be hight op= X CP= Y OC= r so as per the property of right angle tringle op^2+CP^2=OC^2 X^2+Y^2=R^2 hence proved
Answered by neerajchem - Wed Jul 23 05:41:55 2008
Q. I need help proving the equation of a circle, which is x^2 + y^2 = r^2. I know that there would have a prove, but I cant seem to find it anywhere. Please help. I need help proving the equation of a circle, with general equations, not relating to actual graphs or anything. I need a general equation that can prove the equation by working from RHS to left hand side, or vic-versa without using actual values as examples, as prove.
Asked by BlitZeD - Wed Jul 23 05:23:12 2008 - - 3 Answers - 1 Comments
A. Go through the following link you will get much knowledge about it for solution of circle equation just draw a circle on a 2D graph keep its center on (0,0) then pick a point on circle draw radius and a perpendiclaer line to x axis now the tintersaction of that line on x axis will be p say o will be center and c will be choosen point on circle than line op will be base of a right angle tringle and oc will be diagonal and cp will be hight op= X CP= Y OC= r so as per the property of right angle tringle op^2+CP^2=OC^2 X^2+Y^2=R^2 hence proved
Answered by neerajchem - Wed Jul 23 05:41:55 2008
What do you think about this mathematicians claims that mathematics and science are meaningless?
Q. What do you think about this mathematicians claims that mathematics and science are meaningless you can download the theories free from
Asked by ANN - Fri Mar 30 12:24:52 2007 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. They are idiots. If they are right, your computer, your TV, cell phones etc cannot work. Don't give them the time of day.
Answered by Gene - Fri Mar 30 14:03:51 2007
Q. What do you think about this mathematicians claims that mathematics and science are meaningless you can download the theories free from
Asked by ANN - Fri Mar 30 12:24:52 2007 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. They are idiots. If they are right, your computer, your TV, cell phones etc cannot work. Don't give them the time of day.
Answered by Gene - Fri Mar 30 14:03:51 2007
When scientists,mathematicians and historians say they have explained something have they really?
Q. My english teacher just gave this topic to write on. I have to write a 600-800 words essay and submit it on wednesday. Well the topic is kinda confusing but i think it means do the scientists, mathematicians and historians explain things for the good of mankind or just for their benefits. So i need some points to state that these people really do things for the good of people and not just for fame. Some quatations linked to the topic will also do. Thanks a million.
Asked by sanjay_tandon9 - Mon Feb 26 06:30:06 2007 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. There was a time when everyone believed the world was flat (some still do, I'm told). Then, explorer Magellan circumnavigated the globe, and scientists "explained" the the world was, in fact, round. However, the sun, moon etc. all moved around the earth. Galileo came up with a "better" model, where the Earth revolves around the sun. The Catholic Church forced him to recant, but they finally admitted he was right- about 450 years later. The thing is, each scientist was creating a model, to explain events the scientist witnessed. Later scientists revised those models, as more data was gathered. SO- with scientists especially, you'd be hard pressed to say "Nobody Will EVER Dispute This !" With each dispute, with each revision, our overall… [cont.]
Answered by Alan - Wed Feb 28 02:52:07 2007
Q. My english teacher just gave this topic to write on. I have to write a 600-800 words essay and submit it on wednesday. Well the topic is kinda confusing but i think it means do the scientists, mathematicians and historians explain things for the good of mankind or just for their benefits. So i need some points to state that these people really do things for the good of people and not just for fame. Some quatations linked to the topic will also do. Thanks a million.
Asked by sanjay_tandon9 - Mon Feb 26 06:30:06 2007 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. There was a time when everyone believed the world was flat (some still do, I'm told). Then, explorer Magellan circumnavigated the globe, and scientists "explained" the the world was, in fact, round. However, the sun, moon etc. all moved around the earth. Galileo came up with a "better" model, where the Earth revolves around the sun. The Catholic Church forced him to recant, but they finally admitted he was right- about 450 years later. The thing is, each scientist was creating a model, to explain events the scientist witnessed. Later scientists revised those models, as more data was gathered. SO- with scientists especially, you'd be hard pressed to say "Nobody Will EVER Dispute This !" With each dispute, with each revision, our overall… [cont.]
Answered by Alan - Wed Feb 28 02:52:07 2007
How do mathematicians even begin writing a proof?
Q. Something I've been curious about for a while. All the proofs I've seen are so complicated and convoluted that I don't see how anyone ever manages to write one. And devoting their whole lives to something so probably impossible seems quite risky, since it could all easily be a waste. So they must have some tangible hopes for success as motivation to continue.
Asked by Jay C - Thu Mar 29 20:32:19 2007 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. You might be interested in reading this interview with Andrew Wiles (Fermat's Last Theorem proof): For instance, in one section: "NOVA: And during those seven years, you could never be sure of achieving a complete proof. AW: I really believed that I was on the right track, but that did not mean that I would necessarily reach my goal. It could be that the methods needed to take the next step may simply be beyond present day mathematics. Perhaps the methods I needed to complete the proof would not be invented for a hundred years. So even if I was on the right track, I could be living in the wrong century." I hope this helps some.
Answered by asmoothwickerchair - Thu Mar 29 20:40:39 2007
Q. Something I've been curious about for a while. All the proofs I've seen are so complicated and convoluted that I don't see how anyone ever manages to write one. And devoting their whole lives to something so probably impossible seems quite risky, since it could all easily be a waste. So they must have some tangible hopes for success as motivation to continue.
Asked by Jay C - Thu Mar 29 20:32:19 2007 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. You might be interested in reading this interview with Andrew Wiles (Fermat's Last Theorem proof): For instance, in one section: "NOVA: And during those seven years, you could never be sure of achieving a complete proof. AW: I really believed that I was on the right track, but that did not mean that I would necessarily reach my goal. It could be that the methods needed to take the next step may simply be beyond present day mathematics. Perhaps the methods I needed to complete the proof would not be invented for a hundred years. So even if I was on the right track, I could be living in the wrong century." I hope this helps some.
Answered by asmoothwickerchair - Thu Mar 29 20:40:39 2007
What do Mathematicians hate being called?
Q. My friend is a Mathematician and I'm a Geologist (Both in university). He keeps calling me a Geographer and I'm stuck as to what the wussy version of a Mathematician is. :) A proper term. not slang.
Asked by veryape85 - Thu Mar 19 16:36:44 2009 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Call him a numerologist. He'll probably hit you for that one.
Answered by C.W.G.K - Thu Mar 19 17:14:03 2009
Q. My friend is a Mathematician and I'm a Geologist (Both in university). He keeps calling me a Geographer and I'm stuck as to what the wussy version of a Mathematician is. :) A proper term. not slang.
Asked by veryape85 - Thu Mar 19 16:36:44 2009 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Call him a numerologist. He'll probably hit you for that one.
Answered by C.W.G.K - Thu Mar 19 17:14:03 2009
What mathematicians did Aristotle Work With?
Q. I can't really find anything, and i've been reaserching for the past two hours. So some help would be great... So far i found Plato.
Asked by Ashley - Wed Mar 19 12:23:58 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. He really didn't contribute many math theories. He did, however, contribute greatly to logic, and other sciences, such as biology. His theories discussed planets, position of stars, and human and animal behavior. Aristotle's writings on the general subject of logic were grouped by the later Peripatetics under the name Organon, or instrument. j
Answered by unknown - Wed Mar 19 12:49:47 2008
Q. I can't really find anything, and i've been reaserching for the past two hours. So some help would be great... So far i found Plato.
Asked by Ashley - Wed Mar 19 12:23:58 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. He really didn't contribute many math theories. He did, however, contribute greatly to logic, and other sciences, such as biology. His theories discussed planets, position of stars, and human and animal behavior. Aristotle's writings on the general subject of logic were grouped by the later Peripatetics under the name Organon, or instrument. j
Answered by unknown - Wed Mar 19 12:49:47 2008
Can one of you mathematicians help me with this crazy calculus problem?
Q. s(t) = Acos(wt+b) is an equation of motion of a particle known as simple harmonic motion. When is velocity 0? I found v(t) = s'(t) = -Awsin(wt+b) but don't know how to figure out t=? when v(t)=0. Thank you mathematicians!
Asked by Joon-Suk P - Wed Oct 1 01:17:05 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. i assume the problem is not asking for a numerical answer. as you said, the derivative of the position function s(t) is velocity function v(t) so, set v(t) = 0 0 = -Aw*sin(wt+b) 0 = sin(wt+b) arcsin(0) = wt+b arcsin(0) - b = wt t = (arcsin(0) - b)/w furthermore, arcsin 0 = 0 thus, t= -b/w but remember, sines and cosines are cyclic if there is no constraint, then the actual answer is: t= (-b + npi)/w i hope this helps.
Answered by GinGi - Wed Oct 1 01:35:36 2008
Q. s(t) = Acos(wt+b) is an equation of motion of a particle known as simple harmonic motion. When is velocity 0? I found v(t) = s'(t) = -Awsin(wt+b) but don't know how to figure out t=? when v(t)=0. Thank you mathematicians!
Asked by Joon-Suk P - Wed Oct 1 01:17:05 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. i assume the problem is not asking for a numerical answer. as you said, the derivative of the position function s(t) is velocity function v(t) so, set v(t) = 0 0 = -Aw*sin(wt+b) 0 = sin(wt+b) arcsin(0) = wt+b arcsin(0) - b = wt t = (arcsin(0) - b)/w furthermore, arcsin 0 = 0 thus, t= -b/w but remember, sines and cosines are cyclic if there is no constraint, then the actual answer is: t= (-b + npi)/w i hope this helps.
Answered by GinGi - Wed Oct 1 01:35:36 2008
How do mathematicians invent new math? What are the limits?
Q. I understand that Leibniz and Newton are credited with the "invention" of calculus, for example. But I don't understand how people can actually invent new math. How do they do it, and what are the limits to inventing future maths?
Asked by rockdavinci - Tue Apr 25 16:24:09 2006 - - 1 Answers - 1 Comments
A. Well there is still a list of unsolved mathematical problems called Hilbert's 23 challenges. Most math develops form the need to correlate new equations to streamline comparisons or find new ways to predict observable behavior. the former being how calculus of founded. 's_problems
Answered by mastertrell - Thu Apr 27 09:45:50 2006
Q. I understand that Leibniz and Newton are credited with the "invention" of calculus, for example. But I don't understand how people can actually invent new math. How do they do it, and what are the limits to inventing future maths?
Asked by rockdavinci - Tue Apr 25 16:24:09 2006 - - 1 Answers - 1 Comments
A. Well there is still a list of unsolved mathematical problems called Hilbert's 23 challenges. Most math develops form the need to correlate new equations to streamline comparisons or find new ways to predict observable behavior. the former being how calculus of founded. 's_problems
Answered by mastertrell - Thu Apr 27 09:45:50 2006
What do you think might be the cause of nervous breakdowns of many famous Mathematicians?
Q. That definitely cannot be caused by their work on Mathematics or that they could not solve some equation or anything like that but that has to do something with the specific way they think.
Asked by imreko - Sun Feb 10 12:02:05 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I think the common belief that thinking too much isn't the only cause. I think that smart people tend to have loose wires. I have some smart people in my family--at least six uncles and cousins were brilliant at math. They all had nervous breakdowns. I think that the illness--whether it was schizophrenia, depression, etc was already there. My mother feared it with me--I remember she would keep checking up on me, making sure I would take breaks from studying--I think she feared I would inherit this. Sure enough, long hours of studying and isolation, like the previous commentator mentioned, sparked a bout with depression. I'm afraid I'll have a breakdown too. Interestingly many writers and artists struggle with depression.
Answered by Rosemarie C - Sun Feb 10 12:27:13 2008
Q. That definitely cannot be caused by their work on Mathematics or that they could not solve some equation or anything like that but that has to do something with the specific way they think.
Asked by imreko - Sun Feb 10 12:02:05 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I think the common belief that thinking too much isn't the only cause. I think that smart people tend to have loose wires. I have some smart people in my family--at least six uncles and cousins were brilliant at math. They all had nervous breakdowns. I think that the illness--whether it was schizophrenia, depression, etc was already there. My mother feared it with me--I remember she would keep checking up on me, making sure I would take breaks from studying--I think she feared I would inherit this. Sure enough, long hours of studying and isolation, like the previous commentator mentioned, sparked a bout with depression. I'm afraid I'll have a breakdown too. Interestingly many writers and artists struggle with depression.
Answered by Rosemarie C - Sun Feb 10 12:27:13 2008
Where can I post some information for all the mathematicians in the world to see?
Q. I want to place some theories I created myself for all the mathematical world to see. It's not that I'm a genius or anything. Just a few theories that might help the world. Might is the word. Can you guys provide me a website I could put this stuff in? I can't make a website. It's a hassle and I'd only post 2 theories.
Asked by yuri_quijano - Tue Jul 22 08:37:23 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Make your own website, a domain is good to start of. Name your website according to the things that you would put into it like Math theories or something like that. It's up to you. When Mathematicians and people searches on yahoo or google they could easily find your theories on your own website... Here are some of the websites that offers free domains...(you could find other domain websites if you like..there are a lot!!) or this one a blog: https://www.blogger.com/s tart
Answered by :) - Tue Jul 22 09:01:05 2008
Q. I want to place some theories I created myself for all the mathematical world to see. It's not that I'm a genius or anything. Just a few theories that might help the world. Might is the word. Can you guys provide me a website I could put this stuff in? I can't make a website. It's a hassle and I'd only post 2 theories.
Asked by yuri_quijano - Tue Jul 22 08:37:23 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Make your own website, a domain is good to start of. Name your website according to the things that you would put into it like Math theories or something like that. It's up to you. When Mathematicians and people searches on yahoo or google they could easily find your theories on your own website... Here are some of the websites that offers free domains...(you could find other domain websites if you like..there are a lot!!) or this one a blog: https://www.blogger.com/s tart
Answered by :) - Tue Jul 22 09:01:05 2008
What famous authors, scientists and mathematicians believed in God?
Q. I know Albert Einstein believed in God but who else?
Asked by 1471phillip - Tue May 19 23:00:46 2009 - - 14 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Albert Einstein John Mayer Isaac Newton Carrie Underwood Taylor Swift Amy Lee William Shakespeare
Answered by Fuzzy Hairy Guy - Tue May 19 23:06:08 2009
Q. I know Albert Einstein believed in God but who else?
Asked by 1471phillip - Tue May 19 23:00:46 2009 - - 14 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Albert Einstein John Mayer Isaac Newton Carrie Underwood Taylor Swift Amy Lee William Shakespeare
Answered by Fuzzy Hairy Guy - Tue May 19 23:06:08 2009
Do mathematicians have higher standards of truth in their personal lives?
Q. Or does a sleight of hand in the personal life enter into the published papers?
Asked by Julie - Fri Feb 27 10:17:00 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I currently work for a sleezy character, and I would not buy a used car from him, nor would I believe anything in any of the papers he publishes. The sleeze bucket I work for publishes applied mathematics in clinical journals (i.e. medical journals) that don't have reviewers with expertise in mathematics to comment on the sloppy work he does. However, pure mathematics might be a bit different, just because the peer review process for a mathematics journal would rigorously check the logic in his papers before publication. Although, it is an interesting question - the real mathematicians I know (not my sleezy boss who is not trained in mathematics) do appear to be very conscientious in their personal lives.
Answered by WildOtter - Fri Feb 27 10:35:27 2009
Q. Or does a sleight of hand in the personal life enter into the published papers?
Asked by Julie - Fri Feb 27 10:17:00 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I currently work for a sleezy character, and I would not buy a used car from him, nor would I believe anything in any of the papers he publishes. The sleeze bucket I work for publishes applied mathematics in clinical journals (i.e. medical journals) that don't have reviewers with expertise in mathematics to comment on the sloppy work he does. However, pure mathematics might be a bit different, just because the peer review process for a mathematics journal would rigorously check the logic in his papers before publication. Although, it is an interesting question - the real mathematicians I know (not my sleezy boss who is not trained in mathematics) do appear to be very conscientious in their personal lives.
Answered by WildOtter - Fri Feb 27 10:35:27 2009
From Yahoo Answer Search: 'mathematicians'
Sat Nov 21 20:14:45 2009 [ refresh local cache ]
[Hide]▼
news.google.com
Reuters
Engineers, scientists, and mathematicians use Maplesoft products to enable them to work better, faster, and smarter. Maplesoft`s customers include Ford, ...
and more »
justinline.com
530px x 456px | 86.40kB
[source page]
Pick up a copy of Level One or the recently released Level Two at their myspace page
rizkibeo.wordpress.com
rizkibeo
Sat, 13 Jun 2009 00:54:15 GM
A team of MIT . mathematicians. has developed a model that describes how and under what conditions such jams form, which could help road designers minimize the odds of their formation. The researchers reported their findings May 26 in the ...
[Hide]▲
