Red Co. can estimate the amount of loss that will occur if a foreign government expropriates some?
Q. Red Co. can estimate the amount of loss that will occur if a foreign government expropriates some of the company's assets in that country. If expropriation is probable, a loss contingency should be A. Disclosed but not accrued as a liability. B. Disclosed and accrued as a liability C. Accrued as liability but not disclosed. D. Neither accrued as a liability nor disclosed.
Asked by Robert C - Wed Jul 29 14:30:42 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. B. Disclosed and accrued as a liability
Answered by capwest5a - Wed Jul 29 14:49:27 2009
Q. Red Co. can estimate the amount of loss that will occur if a foreign government expropriates some of the company's assets in that country. If expropriation is probable, a loss contingency should be A. Disclosed but not accrued as a liability. B. Disclosed and accrued as a liability C. Accrued as liability but not disclosed. D. Neither accrued as a liability nor disclosed.
Asked by Robert C - Wed Jul 29 14:30:42 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. B. Disclosed and accrued as a liability
Answered by capwest5a - Wed Jul 29 14:49:27 2009
Blue Co. can estimate the amount of loss that will occur if a foreign government expropriates?
Q. Blue Co. can estimate the amount of loss that will occur if a foreign government expropriates some of the company's assets in that country. If the likelihood of expropriation is remote, a loss contingency should be A. Disclosed but not accrued as a liability. B. Disclosed and accrued as a liability C. Accrued as liability but not disclosed. D. Neither accrued as a liability nor disclosed.
Asked by Robert C - Wed Jul 29 14:32:37 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. no cheating. do your own work for your test. and stop posting this question with different colors.
Answered by sattp - Wed Jul 29 14:39:23 2009
Q. Blue Co. can estimate the amount of loss that will occur if a foreign government expropriates some of the company's assets in that country. If the likelihood of expropriation is remote, a loss contingency should be A. Disclosed but not accrued as a liability. B. Disclosed and accrued as a liability C. Accrued as liability but not disclosed. D. Neither accrued as a liability nor disclosed.
Asked by Robert C - Wed Jul 29 14:32:37 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. no cheating. do your own work for your test. and stop posting this question with different colors.
Answered by sattp - Wed Jul 29 14:39:23 2009
Why does Michelle Obama want to expropriate other people's property for those she deems more worthy ?
Q. Michelle Obama: "someone is going to have to give up a piece of their pie so that someone else can have more" Couldn't an armed robber use this same justification?
Asked by Rev. Cleophus - Tue May 6 14:40:35 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Because she thinks she is just so much smarter and better than everyone else, that she gets to decide what they need. Isn't that what Marxism is all about? If they protest, claim they are turning to religion in their bitterness. The extra bad part is that she has shown (through her thesis and her choice of church) that she has even more sinister motives than telling the masses how to live.
Answered by opinionated1984 - Tue May 6 15:11:24 2008
Q. Michelle Obama: "someone is going to have to give up a piece of their pie so that someone else can have more" Couldn't an armed robber use this same justification?
Asked by Rev. Cleophus - Tue May 6 14:40:35 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Because she thinks she is just so much smarter and better than everyone else, that she gets to decide what they need. Isn't that what Marxism is all about? If they protest, claim they are turning to religion in their bitterness. The extra bad part is that she has shown (through her thesis and her choice of church) that she has even more sinister motives than telling the masses how to live.
Answered by opinionated1984 - Tue May 6 15:11:24 2008
Please tell me how Chavez Nationalizing the Oil Companies is different from Obama with the Banks?
Q. The law puts the state in charge of companies providing a range of services The law will let the government expropriate companies and compensate firms with bonds instead of cash The move appears targeted at specific service companies that have been hampered by severe cash flow
Asked by White House Watching - Sat May 9 10:17:46 2009 - - 11 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Obama's takeover of Chrysler most closely resembes the Chavez tactics - where secured bondholders are cheated and the executive assumes the power of the judiciary to override the legal system.
Answered by Shovel Ready - Sat May 9 10:24:14 2009
Q. The law puts the state in charge of companies providing a range of services The law will let the government expropriate companies and compensate firms with bonds instead of cash The move appears targeted at specific service companies that have been hampered by severe cash flow
Asked by White House Watching - Sat May 9 10:17:46 2009 - - 11 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Obama's takeover of Chrysler most closely resembes the Chavez tactics - where secured bondholders are cheated and the executive assumes the power of the judiciary to override the legal system.
Answered by Shovel Ready - Sat May 9 10:24:14 2009
If Canada is encouraging more people to become farmers, why is the government making life so hard for them?
Q. Only 0.5 of Canada's land is farmland. With constantly rising populations, that's not enough to feed Canada. if we want/need more farmers, though, where are we making it so difficult to be a farmer? THe goverment expropriates land, builds tons of houses, etc. What are we to do?
Asked by Lady Ghost - Tue Nov 11 16:46:25 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. because the government is awsome
Answered by lancekiolbassa - Tue Nov 11 16:55:01 2008
Q. Only 0.5 of Canada's land is farmland. With constantly rising populations, that's not enough to feed Canada. if we want/need more farmers, though, where are we making it so difficult to be a farmer? THe goverment expropriates land, builds tons of houses, etc. What are we to do?
Asked by Lady Ghost - Tue Nov 11 16:46:25 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. because the government is awsome
Answered by lancekiolbassa - Tue Nov 11 16:55:01 2008
If the government were to have a private army of peopel who are designed to police or ruin lives, could it be?
Q. possible that they can possibly destroy the career and expropriate people's properties by putting them on a blacklist?
Asked by cookies - Thu Sep 17 15:38:44 2009 - - 9 Answers - 0 Comments
A. your scenario sounds a lot like what joe mccarthy tried to do back in the fifties, not necessarily with a private "military army", but certainly with a small army of vocal extremists that struck fear into the hearts of every liberal thinker of the time. By accusing some of being "communists", mccarthy effectively did get people "blacklisted" and ruined lives, no question. Today, we are seeing much of the same tactics used back then. Finally, someone once said "unless we learn from history, we are bound to repeat it", and that appears to be coming true. we (you and i) may (or may not) disagree, but you've asked an intelligent question, free from childish comments (against either party), and i applaud your maturity.
Answered by good guy - Thu Sep 17 15:52:07 2009
Q. possible that they can possibly destroy the career and expropriate people's properties by putting them on a blacklist?
Asked by cookies - Thu Sep 17 15:38:44 2009 - - 9 Answers - 0 Comments
A. your scenario sounds a lot like what joe mccarthy tried to do back in the fifties, not necessarily with a private "military army", but certainly with a small army of vocal extremists that struck fear into the hearts of every liberal thinker of the time. By accusing some of being "communists", mccarthy effectively did get people "blacklisted" and ruined lives, no question. Today, we are seeing much of the same tactics used back then. Finally, someone once said "unless we learn from history, we are bound to repeat it", and that appears to be coming true. we (you and i) may (or may not) disagree, but you've asked an intelligent question, free from childish comments (against either party), and i applaud your maturity.
Answered by good guy - Thu Sep 17 15:52:07 2009
Now that the banks are making obscene profits again, do you regret Obama's cowardice about nationalization?
Q. The bankers get rich, the workers get unemployed, and its not going to change any time soon. We COULD have expropriated the expropriators, and used that capital to reinvest in American infrastructure to generate jobs for American workers. But Obama listened to the conservatives from Wall street instead.
Asked by longhaired freaky person - Wed Jul 15 01:37:00 2009 - - 12 Answers - 0 Comments
Q. The bankers get rich, the workers get unemployed, and its not going to change any time soon. We COULD have expropriated the expropriators, and used that capital to reinvest in American infrastructure to generate jobs for American workers. But Obama listened to the conservatives from Wall street instead.
Asked by longhaired freaky person - Wed Jul 15 01:37:00 2009 - - 12 Answers - 0 Comments
Are conspiracy theories created by governments to undermine anti-government movements?
Q. I'm specifically referring to the fringe conspiracy theories about how some secret society of people rule the world and are conspiring to enslave everybody and there is nothing anybody can do to stop them. Obviously, there are groups of people who want to control others, enslave them, and expropriate wealth from them. These organizations are known as governments. Because governments are inherently oppressive institutions and because the establishment parties are virtually identical in most "democratic" countries, this gives the conspiracy theories a superficial appearance of being right in the minds of many. For the same reasons, people who make spurious arguments about how somehow people aren't required by the US government to pay… [cont.]
Asked by Brad - Thu Jan 22 23:09:21 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Sometimes maybe yes, sometimes maybe no. About the income tax amendment. Congress illegally ratified the 16th amendment because the amendment was not ratified by the minimum number of states needed to make it legal.
Answered by Cassie - Tue Jan 27 08:34:22 2009
Q. I'm specifically referring to the fringe conspiracy theories about how some secret society of people rule the world and are conspiring to enslave everybody and there is nothing anybody can do to stop them. Obviously, there are groups of people who want to control others, enslave them, and expropriate wealth from them. These organizations are known as governments. Because governments are inherently oppressive institutions and because the establishment parties are virtually identical in most "democratic" countries, this gives the conspiracy theories a superficial appearance of being right in the minds of many. For the same reasons, people who make spurious arguments about how somehow people aren't required by the US government to pay… [cont.]
Asked by Brad - Thu Jan 22 23:09:21 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Sometimes maybe yes, sometimes maybe no. About the income tax amendment. Congress illegally ratified the 16th amendment because the amendment was not ratified by the minimum number of states needed to make it legal.
Answered by Cassie - Tue Jan 27 08:34:22 2009
Can Muslims Bring the Western Civilization to an End?
Q. I found this by accident. They are quite clear what they intend to do. This looks like a U.S. website too. With great aplomb they will refer to the Qur anic verses (such as 2:30, 6:165, 7:129, 27:62) which firmly declare that only the Muslims are the rightful inheritors of earth. Allah has assured the victory of Islam by expropriating and usurping the land of the infidels and hand them over to the Muslims (verses 13:41, 21:44, 28:58). The Islamic world is patiently waiting for this ultimate victory of Islam no infidel should bear any doubt on this mindset of great majority of Islamic diehards. There are thousands of Islamic organizations in the West whose job is to keep pushing their Islamic agenda to reshape the West. The message… [cont.]
Asked by Boycott Hollywd Commies - Thu Sep 6 22:02:27 2007 - - 16 Answers - 0 Comments
A. It's not likely. I don't have any friends that would be willing to wear a berka and have a Muslim man treat them worse than an animal. Do you know that Muslim women can be murdered by their husbands and there is no consequence in Sharia Law?
Answered by Robert J - Thu Sep 6 22:07:44 2007
Q. I found this by accident. They are quite clear what they intend to do. This looks like a U.S. website too. With great aplomb they will refer to the Qur anic verses (such as 2:30, 6:165, 7:129, 27:62) which firmly declare that only the Muslims are the rightful inheritors of earth. Allah has assured the victory of Islam by expropriating and usurping the land of the infidels and hand them over to the Muslims (verses 13:41, 21:44, 28:58). The Islamic world is patiently waiting for this ultimate victory of Islam no infidel should bear any doubt on this mindset of great majority of Islamic diehards. There are thousands of Islamic organizations in the West whose job is to keep pushing their Islamic agenda to reshape the West. The message… [cont.]
Asked by Boycott Hollywd Commies - Thu Sep 6 22:02:27 2007 - - 16 Answers - 0 Comments
A. It's not likely. I don't have any friends that would be willing to wear a berka and have a Muslim man treat them worse than an animal. Do you know that Muslim women can be murdered by their husbands and there is no consequence in Sharia Law?
Answered by Robert J - Thu Sep 6 22:07:44 2007
Did the perpetrators expropriate anything else from the domicile?
Q. Did the perpetrators expropriate anything else from the domicile?
Asked by N M - Wed Mar 7 15:43:50 2007 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The slithery scoundrels skeedaddled swiftly south with their stolen stuff!
Answered by tx_dianna - Sun Mar 11 00:47:06 2007
Q. Did the perpetrators expropriate anything else from the domicile?
Asked by N M - Wed Mar 7 15:43:50 2007 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The slithery scoundrels skeedaddled swiftly south with their stolen stuff!
Answered by tx_dianna - Sun Mar 11 00:47:06 2007
Is HBO's "John Adams" saying Hamilton created the Zionist Fed Reserve Bank?
Q. It s ridiculous because the Federal Reserve Bank isn't federal but is a privately owned bank of Zionist families like the Rockerfellers and the Rothschilds that they created in 1913, and has ever since expropriated money from working Americans by creating the income tax and loaning our own money at interest. Do you actually think Hamilton said that for our country to be in debt was good because it created an economic viability so we could borrow more money from other countries?
Asked by swisher - Thu May 1 23:42:28 2008 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. If the American People ever allow the banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers occupied. The issuing power of money should be taken from the bankers and restored to Congress and the people to whom it belongs. I sincerely believe the banking institutions having the issuing power of money are more dangerous to liberty than standing armies. We are completely saddled and bridled, and the bank is so firmly mounted on us that we must go where they ill guide. The dominion which the banking institutions have obtained over the minds… [cont.]
Answered by jpenergy@sbcglobal.net - Thu May 1 23:49:52 2008
Q. It s ridiculous because the Federal Reserve Bank isn't federal but is a privately owned bank of Zionist families like the Rockerfellers and the Rothschilds that they created in 1913, and has ever since expropriated money from working Americans by creating the income tax and loaning our own money at interest. Do you actually think Hamilton said that for our country to be in debt was good because it created an economic viability so we could borrow more money from other countries?
Asked by swisher - Thu May 1 23:42:28 2008 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. If the American People ever allow the banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers occupied. The issuing power of money should be taken from the bankers and restored to Congress and the people to whom it belongs. I sincerely believe the banking institutions having the issuing power of money are more dangerous to liberty than standing armies. We are completely saddled and bridled, and the bank is so firmly mounted on us that we must go where they ill guide. The dominion which the banking institutions have obtained over the minds… [cont.]
Answered by jpenergy@sbcglobal.net - Thu May 1 23:49:52 2008
can anyone Identify two nations that illegally expropriated property from US businesses in the 20th century?
Q. if you can... can you describe what happened in each case. or atleast give me a website link that could help me out here.. I have been searching everywhere. thanks in advance!
Asked by frederick - Mon Jul 10 22:46:50 2006 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Mexico, during nationalization of the oil industry, 1938 Cuba, during the communist takeover, 1960
Answered by I. B. Zoxx - Mon Jul 10 23:07:05 2006
Q. if you can... can you describe what happened in each case. or atleast give me a website link that could help me out here.. I have been searching everywhere. thanks in advance!
Asked by frederick - Mon Jul 10 22:46:50 2006 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Mexico, during nationalization of the oil industry, 1938 Cuba, during the communist takeover, 1960
Answered by I. B. Zoxx - Mon Jul 10 23:07:05 2006
Answerers own the copyrights of their answers, right?! What happens when the account gets deleted?
Q. does Yahoo expropriate all answers and do you think it is fair not to be able to take back what you have been giving so generously till now. My question was inspired by this one about the suspension of Stephan K
Asked by Ralph M - Fri Feb 15 13:16:13 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. It's a touchy point, it is. Here is a quote from section 9 of the TOS (not CG): "However, with respect to Content you submit or make available for inclusion on publicly accessible areas of the Service, you grant Yahoo! the following worldwide, royalty-free and non-exclusive license(s), as applicable." So, without the legaleze, if he has copies of them, he can 'use' them elsewhere (their license is 'non-exclusive'), but I don't see where he has the right to request the return of his material from them. But I AM very, very saddened that he has suffered this fate.
Answered by Yahzmin (US) [busy] - Fri Feb 15 13:34:16 2008
Q. does Yahoo expropriate all answers and do you think it is fair not to be able to take back what you have been giving so generously till now. My question was inspired by this one about the suspension of Stephan K
Asked by Ralph M - Fri Feb 15 13:16:13 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. It's a touchy point, it is. Here is a quote from section 9 of the TOS (not CG): "However, with respect to Content you submit or make available for inclusion on publicly accessible areas of the Service, you grant Yahoo! the following worldwide, royalty-free and non-exclusive license(s), as applicable." So, without the legaleze, if he has copies of them, he can 'use' them elsewhere (their license is 'non-exclusive'), but I don't see where he has the right to request the return of his material from them. But I AM very, very saddened that he has suffered this fate.
Answered by Yahzmin (US) [busy] - Fri Feb 15 13:34:16 2008
The Dominion Lands Act?
Q. A. Expropriated land for the construction of the Canadian National Railway B. granted territory to the native people of Manitoba C. Enabled many immigrants to purchase and settle a plot of land? D. Expanded the territory occupied by Manitoba Ont and Quebec?
Asked by ammy.walker - Tue Jul 22 12:00:27 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. C. Enabled many immigrants to purchase and settle a plot of land The Dominion Lands Act (short for An Act Respecting the Public Lands of the Dominion) was an 1872 Canadian law that aimed to encourage the settlement of Canada's prairie provinces. It was closely based on the United States Homestead Act, setting the parameters within which western land could be settled and its natural resources developed. Canada thus invited mass settlement by European and American pioneers. The act sold 160 acres (65 ha) for the extremely low price of $10 to any male farmer who agreed to cultivate at least 40 acres (16.25 ha) and build a permanent dwelling within three years. This condition of proving up the homestead was instituted to prevent speculators… [cont.]
Answered by HRH Princess Deb - Tue Jul 22 12:07:40 2008
Q. A. Expropriated land for the construction of the Canadian National Railway B. granted territory to the native people of Manitoba C. Enabled many immigrants to purchase and settle a plot of land? D. Expanded the territory occupied by Manitoba Ont and Quebec?
Asked by ammy.walker - Tue Jul 22 12:00:27 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. C. Enabled many immigrants to purchase and settle a plot of land The Dominion Lands Act (short for An Act Respecting the Public Lands of the Dominion) was an 1872 Canadian law that aimed to encourage the settlement of Canada's prairie provinces. It was closely based on the United States Homestead Act, setting the parameters within which western land could be settled and its natural resources developed. Canada thus invited mass settlement by European and American pioneers. The act sold 160 acres (65 ha) for the extremely low price of $10 to any male farmer who agreed to cultivate at least 40 acres (16.25 ha) and build a permanent dwelling within three years. This condition of proving up the homestead was instituted to prevent speculators… [cont.]
Answered by HRH Princess Deb - Tue Jul 22 12:07:40 2008
Down With Myth Shevey- Similar Experiences????
Q. Having had to endure (and survive it...just) 20 years of exploitation, expropriation, and commercialization of the `Down With Myth America` film piece, I am absolutely staggered by the political campaign to do me out of the Alfred Hitchcock research. Not only has some yokel expropriated all the locations I have managed to divine (many absolutely unknown in 1999) but now there is a film about Slavoj Zizek who, among other things, fancies himself something of an authority on Hitchcock. Could the CIA have arranged this stuff? It is really too awful even for the CIA.
Asked by sandra_shevey - Tue May 8 07:09:04 2007 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Good question. I think so. I am too embarrassed to relate my own experiences.
Answered by Budge - Tue May 8 10:56:32 2007
Q. Having had to endure (and survive it...just) 20 years of exploitation, expropriation, and commercialization of the `Down With Myth America` film piece, I am absolutely staggered by the political campaign to do me out of the Alfred Hitchcock research. Not only has some yokel expropriated all the locations I have managed to divine (many absolutely unknown in 1999) but now there is a film about Slavoj Zizek who, among other things, fancies himself something of an authority on Hitchcock. Could the CIA have arranged this stuff? It is really too awful even for the CIA.
Asked by sandra_shevey - Tue May 8 07:09:04 2007 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Good question. I think so. I am too embarrassed to relate my own experiences.
Answered by Budge - Tue May 8 10:56:32 2007
Fair Trade - Ugh!?
Q. Fair Trade is being used as usual by the capitalists as a tool to push out the minicapitalists and to expropriate the product of minicapitalists by supporting the crusades of the borough councils, nonprofit organisations, etc. But who gave the above the right to expropriate? Because they are Christian? Because they say they are serving the Third World? Because they purport to be community-spirited? Not just one but several of my own projects have been incorporated into events by the community-spirited folk who have got the councils and businesses behind them because they purport to be community-spirited. But they`re making their donations with my money. Talk straight!
Asked by sandra_shevey - Sat May 26 09:26:27 2007 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I've noticed a lot of malarkey going on at the moment that is helping to grind small businesses into dust. All this eco friendly stuff, although good in principle, is actually just going to put many people out of business and make everyone work for some horrendous soulless multinational company. It scares the living daylights out of me!! And what about this pay-as-you-drive scheme for the roads, who do you think will feel the worst effects of that? The small businesses of course!! My dad runs an independant tyre dealership so I know what this sick society is doing to small businesses. I feel for you, the poxy councils are all part of the grand plan to get everyone under the yoke of the multinational.
Answered by Princess Paradox - Sat May 26 09:39:48 2007
Q. Fair Trade is being used as usual by the capitalists as a tool to push out the minicapitalists and to expropriate the product of minicapitalists by supporting the crusades of the borough councils, nonprofit organisations, etc. But who gave the above the right to expropriate? Because they are Christian? Because they say they are serving the Third World? Because they purport to be community-spirited? Not just one but several of my own projects have been incorporated into events by the community-spirited folk who have got the councils and businesses behind them because they purport to be community-spirited. But they`re making their donations with my money. Talk straight!
Asked by sandra_shevey - Sat May 26 09:26:27 2007 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I've noticed a lot of malarkey going on at the moment that is helping to grind small businesses into dust. All this eco friendly stuff, although good in principle, is actually just going to put many people out of business and make everyone work for some horrendous soulless multinational company. It scares the living daylights out of me!! And what about this pay-as-you-drive scheme for the roads, who do you think will feel the worst effects of that? The small businesses of course!! My dad runs an independant tyre dealership so I know what this sick society is doing to small businesses. I feel for you, the poxy councils are all part of the grand plan to get everyone under the yoke of the multinational.
Answered by Princess Paradox - Sat May 26 09:39:48 2007
The Israeli Anglo-AmeriKKKan Axis of Evil! This article is the truth dont you agree???
Q. The Israeli Anglo-AmeriKKKan Axis of Evil Junious Ricardo Stanton Jul 28, 2006 03:42 PDT *From The Ramparts* Junious Ricardo Stanton *The Israeli Anglo-AmeriKKKan Axis of Evi*l / "One day before the Israeli air strikes, the main partners and shareholders of the BTC pipeline project, including several heads of State and oil company executives were in attendance at the port of Ceyhan. They were then rushed off for an inauguration reception in Istanbul, hosted by Turkey's President Ahmet Necdet Sezer in the plush surroundings of the Cyrapan Palace. Also in attendance was British Petroleum's (BP) CEO, Lord Browne together with senior government officials from Britain, the US and Israel. BP leads the BTC pipeline consortium. Other… [cont.]
Asked by Aisha J - Fri Jul 28 15:55:56 2006 - - 9 Answers - 0 Comments
A. just form the way you phrased your opening part of the question, it is obvious you have no clue what you are talking about, only spouting what other anti-american people have written that sounds strangely like all the 50 million other conspiracy theories out there...come up with a real valid question and don't taint it from the start and MAYBE you'll get a good answer.
Answered by thirteen_fox - Fri Jul 28 16:00:10 2006
Q. The Israeli Anglo-AmeriKKKan Axis of Evil Junious Ricardo Stanton Jul 28, 2006 03:42 PDT *From The Ramparts* Junious Ricardo Stanton *The Israeli Anglo-AmeriKKKan Axis of Evi*l / "One day before the Israeli air strikes, the main partners and shareholders of the BTC pipeline project, including several heads of State and oil company executives were in attendance at the port of Ceyhan. They were then rushed off for an inauguration reception in Istanbul, hosted by Turkey's President Ahmet Necdet Sezer in the plush surroundings of the Cyrapan Palace. Also in attendance was British Petroleum's (BP) CEO, Lord Browne together with senior government officials from Britain, the US and Israel. BP leads the BTC pipeline consortium. Other… [cont.]
Asked by Aisha J - Fri Jul 28 15:55:56 2006 - - 9 Answers - 0 Comments
A. just form the way you phrased your opening part of the question, it is obvious you have no clue what you are talking about, only spouting what other anti-american people have written that sounds strangely like all the 50 million other conspiracy theories out there...come up with a real valid question and don't taint it from the start and MAYBE you'll get a good answer.
Answered by thirteen_fox - Fri Jul 28 16:00:10 2006
Liberals, conservatives, Democrats, republicans, do you agree with this?
Q. Please, if you take the time to read these excerpts, (or maybe the full article) please give me your honest assessment as to whether you believe these things to be true. I'm very conservative, but I'm not looking to bash anyone here, I want to know if people of all political persuasions find these credible. begin excerpts... All intelligent political analysts have known since Ancient Greece that the Tyrannical State always arrives on gentle cat's paws, as Plato and others put it, after it had been used so effectively by Peisistratus to build the first full-blown tyranny in Athens ...The Tyrant always arrives as the Great Friend of the People promising them new freedoms and a vast cornucopia of free goodies. Peisistratus was lucky enough… [cont.]
Asked by Moosecox - Sat Oct 10 08:13:42 2009 - - 13 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Well, freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one... And, no longer are Republicans arguing with Democrats about whether government should be BIG or SMALL. Instead they are at odds over what kind of big government the USA should have. Independent A:~)
Answered by Anarchist - Sat Oct 10 08:21:11 2009
Q. Please, if you take the time to read these excerpts, (or maybe the full article) please give me your honest assessment as to whether you believe these things to be true. I'm very conservative, but I'm not looking to bash anyone here, I want to know if people of all political persuasions find these credible. begin excerpts... All intelligent political analysts have known since Ancient Greece that the Tyrannical State always arrives on gentle cat's paws, as Plato and others put it, after it had been used so effectively by Peisistratus to build the first full-blown tyranny in Athens ...The Tyrant always arrives as the Great Friend of the People promising them new freedoms and a vast cornucopia of free goodies. Peisistratus was lucky enough… [cont.]
Asked by Moosecox - Sat Oct 10 08:13:42 2009 - - 13 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Well, freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one... And, no longer are Republicans arguing with Democrats about whether government should be BIG or SMALL. Instead they are at odds over what kind of big government the USA should have. Independent A:~)
Answered by Anarchist - Sat Oct 10 08:21:11 2009
Did all liberals go to public school? Don't they know Nazis were socialists?
Q. Liberals that obviously don't know history keep saying that the right wing are nazis. I thought ID give your education a little nudge in the right direction. Did they manage to miss the 25 founding tenants of nazism?> Can an educated person not see socialism here? 2. We demand that the German people have rights equal to those of other nations; and that the Peace Treaties of Versailles and St. Germain shall be abrogated. Like obama not following nafta and gatt after his party made them law? 7. We demand that the State shall above all undertake to ensure that every citizen shall have the possibility of living decently and earning a livelihood. Wow, can you say the DNCs "living wage" program? 9. All citizens must possess equal… [cont.]
Asked by gissim0 - Fri Sep 4 10:02:28 2009 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Yeah in my experience, libs are by far the most likely to accuse people of being Nazi/racist/fascist et cetera, but when you really look at it objectively, their idealism is much closer to National Socialism, by definition, than anything coming out of the right. I especially got a kick out of the guy that said, "National Socialism isn't socialism." Who is he trying to kid? I guess the self-deceiving liberal intellect thinks that such a ridiculous assertion will fool someone. Socialism fails every time it is tried, and every time, there's some bunch of liberals claiming that this time it will be different. I recognize the Nazi agenda in everything they do: the demonization of whites, the overt use of propaganda, the pity tactics, the… [cont.]
Answered by unknown - Fri Sep 4 15:09:19 2009
Q. Liberals that obviously don't know history keep saying that the right wing are nazis. I thought ID give your education a little nudge in the right direction. Did they manage to miss the 25 founding tenants of nazism?> Can an educated person not see socialism here? 2. We demand that the German people have rights equal to those of other nations; and that the Peace Treaties of Versailles and St. Germain shall be abrogated. Like obama not following nafta and gatt after his party made them law? 7. We demand that the State shall above all undertake to ensure that every citizen shall have the possibility of living decently and earning a livelihood. Wow, can you say the DNCs "living wage" program? 9. All citizens must possess equal… [cont.]
Asked by gissim0 - Fri Sep 4 10:02:28 2009 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Yeah in my experience, libs are by far the most likely to accuse people of being Nazi/racist/fascist et cetera, but when you really look at it objectively, their idealism is much closer to National Socialism, by definition, than anything coming out of the right. I especially got a kick out of the guy that said, "National Socialism isn't socialism." Who is he trying to kid? I guess the self-deceiving liberal intellect thinks that such a ridiculous assertion will fool someone. Socialism fails every time it is tried, and every time, there's some bunch of liberals claiming that this time it will be different. I recognize the Nazi agenda in everything they do: the demonization of whites, the overt use of propaganda, the pity tactics, the… [cont.]
Answered by unknown - Fri Sep 4 15:09:19 2009
With all these great things. What was so bad about the Nazi's?
Q. Statements on the Internet on what the Nazis invented/ contributed to the modern world Volkswagen KdF computer, invented by Konrad Zuse 1941. Jet plane in 1939 by Heinkel Flugzeugwerke. The first manned rocket flight in 1945 (unfortunately it lasted only some seconds and pilot Lothar Sieber died) Nazi doctors, in line with their campaign for public health were the first to write a major scientific paper linking smoking with lung cancer, I believe smoking was even banned, for a brief time in the Luftwaffee. Nazis invented Nerve gasses Sarin and Tabun. Invented first effective automatic rifle, single person anti-tank weapons (precursors to RPGs). You can see some magnificant architecture by Speer that was planned in nearly any… [cont.]
Asked by DynodiKk - Thu Jan 29 20:03:20 2009 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Yes, you're right about the inventions and all that stuff. What was bad about them was that they killed 6 million Jews and millions more who they didn't like, had horrible concentration camps where they would put them in gas chambers, had them dig their own graves, starve them to death, and also shot innocent men, women, children, and even babies. They were influenced by one of the most evil men in history, Adolf Hitler. So overall, they were still pretty bad people and there are still Nazis out there even today! So if you talk to people about them, they will still think of them as brutal and evil people. Know this though, not all Germans back then were Nazis. Interesting data you have there.
Answered by Green/Gold 4life - Thu Jan 29 20:20:40 2009
Q. Statements on the Internet on what the Nazis invented/ contributed to the modern world Volkswagen KdF computer, invented by Konrad Zuse 1941. Jet plane in 1939 by Heinkel Flugzeugwerke. The first manned rocket flight in 1945 (unfortunately it lasted only some seconds and pilot Lothar Sieber died) Nazi doctors, in line with their campaign for public health were the first to write a major scientific paper linking smoking with lung cancer, I believe smoking was even banned, for a brief time in the Luftwaffee. Nazis invented Nerve gasses Sarin and Tabun. Invented first effective automatic rifle, single person anti-tank weapons (precursors to RPGs). You can see some magnificant architecture by Speer that was planned in nearly any… [cont.]
Asked by DynodiKk - Thu Jan 29 20:03:20 2009 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Yes, you're right about the inventions and all that stuff. What was bad about them was that they killed 6 million Jews and millions more who they didn't like, had horrible concentration camps where they would put them in gas chambers, had them dig their own graves, starve them to death, and also shot innocent men, women, children, and even babies. They were influenced by one of the most evil men in history, Adolf Hitler. So overall, they were still pretty bad people and there are still Nazis out there even today! So if you talk to people about them, they will still think of them as brutal and evil people. Know this though, not all Germans back then were Nazis. Interesting data you have there.
Answered by Green/Gold 4life - Thu Jan 29 20:20:40 2009
From Yahoo Answer Search: 'expropriates'
Mon Nov 23 05:06:34 2009 [ refresh local cache ]
